Resources
Take the next steps with Tree Equity Score.
Build your case for greater investment in Tree Equity
Get the most out of Tree Equity Score
Write an op-ed, drum up press coverage, create a petition, contact your local elected official, present to a local council, testify at a public hearing, build support for a tree ordinance, create outreach/educational materials and more.
Tree Equity Score data can be a powerful tool whether you're interacting with the media, elected officials or your neighbors. Tree Equity Score offers a national standard for identifying areas in need of investment, and robust information to build your case. By combining data with storytelling, you can convey the importance of Tree Equity issues and advocate for investment and policy changes in your community.
To begin, find your score in the Tree Equity Score National Explorer. Simply enter a location in the search bar or zoom and pan the map until you locate your area of interest. Many people start by exploring the map in the area where they live or work.
Tree Equity Score simplifies the process of locating areas affected first and worst by climate and environmental hazards. Examine the map for the lowest scores. Then, explore additional information to locate areas most in need of trees.
Here's how to use the information in Tree Equity Score to locate priority areas:
Think of a map layers as a sheets of paper in a stack. Each layer represents different information, stacked one above the other. By toggling different layers on or off, you can choose what information, or "sheet," you want to see on the map. Map layers can help you gain a deeper understanding of the patterns and trends unique to your area.
A map filter is a tool that allows you to narrow down or prioritize the information displayed on the map based on specific criteria. Map filters help you focus on the geographic areas that are most relevant to your needs or interests.
On the map, click on each neighborhood to load more information in the side panel. Take note of the Tree Equity Score, community characteristics and tree canopy values. Each data point helps explain why and how scores differ:
For example:
Metric | Neighborhood A |
---|---|
Tree Equity Score | 51 |
Tree canopy cover | 2% |
People of color | 72% |
People in poverty | 17% |
Heat disparity | +12 degrees |
*To summarize metrics for a group of neighborhoods, record information from the sidebar for each neighborhood, then take the average or the range of values for the group.
Make a comparison between a low-scoring neighborhood and a high-scoring neighborhood. How does the community character and tree canopy differ?
For example:
Metric | Neighborhood A | Neighborhood B |
---|---|---|
Tree Equity Score | 51 | 100 |
Tree canopy cover | 2% | 58% |
People of color | 72% | 28% |
People in poverty | 17% | 1% |
Heat disparity | +12 degrees | -4 degrees |
*To summarize metrics for a group of neighborhoods, record information from the sidebar for each neighborhood, then compare the average or the range of values for the group.
To effectively make your case, tell stories about people and weave in data as evidence. This will help your audience connect to your story and deliver your message impactfully.
Meet Juanita and her four children, who call Neighborhood A their home. Their community has a Tree Equity Score of 51, and a meager 2% tree cover. It's a striking contrast to the affluent Neighborhood B across town. With a score of 100 and 58% tree cover, lush trees line the sidewalks.The differences between these two neighborhoods go beyond tree cover. In Juanita's neighborhood, 72% of the residents are people of color, with 17% facing the challenges of poverty. The summers here can be brutal, with temperatures soaring 12 degrees above the area's average. In Neighborhood B, 72% of the residents are white, and only 1% endure poverty. Their summers are comparatively milder, with temperatures averaging 4 degrees cooler.These stark disparities in tree cover and living conditions highlight the urgent need to address Tree Equity. Juanita's neighborhood, with its lower Tree Equity Score and lack of green canopy, faces environmental injustices that affect the well-being and quality of life of its residents. As we tell Juanita's story, it's important to remember that these numbers are not just statistics but crucial indicators of the systemic challenges faced by communities like hers. It's time to take action and ensure equitable access to trees, clean air, shade and a healthy environment.
What is the larger narrative of Tree Equity in your town, city, county, congressional district or state? Use Tree Equity Score to highlight systemic disparities in tree cover on a broader scale and demonstrate how your local cause relates to these broader patterns.
Click on a block group to generate a list of the reports for your area, then choose a report, for example your county report. From the top sections of the report, gather the summary information.
For example:
Metric | Neighborhood A | Smithfield (Average; Range) | York County (Average; Range) |
---|---|---|---|
Tree Equity Score | 51 | 90; 51-100 | 51-100 |
Tree canopy cover | 2% | 14%; 2-68% | 34%; 2-72% |
People of color | 72% | 66%; 28-92% | 54%; 0-96% |
People in poverty | 17% | 21%; 0-65% | 17%; 0-65% |
Health burden index | 44 | 12-68 | 6-72 |
Total population | 1,752 | 16,863 | 61,265 |
*Please note that summaries are for urban areas only, and rural areas are not included.
*Certain metrics are not available in the report. Return to the map to find ranges. Activate specific map layers and and view data points in hover popups. Or apply map filters to isolate the highest and lowest values in an area.
Juanita's neighborhood not only has the lowest Tree Equity Score in Smithfield, but the fewest trees in the county, with just 2% tree cover.
Maps can serve as evidence of regional patterns. Compare different thematic patterns side-by-side. How do the different patterns interconnect? As you toggle between different thematic map layers, you might need to zoom out on the map to observe broader geographic patterns.
Dynamic reports can help you communicate what it takes to raise Tree Equity Scores at a regional level. Dynamic reports are available at four administrative scales: Locality (e.g., a town, city or village), County, Congressional District and State. Each report provides valuable summary metrics, interactive visualizations to help you gain insights for your area of interest, and computational tools to help you assess scenarios and highlight the numerous benefits that can be gained by raising Tree Equity Scores within your community.
From the map
Alternatively, you can search for reports anywhere in the United States. Click "Search all reports."
To search for dynamic reports by the name of a locality, county or state:
To search for congressional district reports:
If you don't know your district, return to the map. Use the search bar located in the upper left of the map to search for your address. Click on your block group. Now your district report will display in the "Reports" menu.
Think of a map layers as a sheets of paper in a stack. Each layer represents different information, stacked one above the other. By toggling different layers on or off, you can choose what information, or "sheet," you want to see on the map. Map layers can help you gain a deeper understanding of the patterns and trends unique to your area.
Maps are highly versatile and can be used to convey the need for Tree Equity and highlight the benefits to members of the community. They can be useful in a number of ways, including in grant applications, presentations to the town board, fliers for a tree planting event, conversations local stakeholders and community members.
Print a PDF of the map
Copy/save an image of the map
Take a screenshot on your device
Visual aids can make your storytelling easier to understand and help connect with your audience.
Comparison photos: Create side-by-side photos of a neighborhood with abundant tree cover and one with inadequate tree cover. If you can't visit the neighborhoods, use Google Street View photos instead.
Before-and-after photos or artist renderings: Show before-and-after photos of greening projects or artist renderings to show how these projects can transform neighborhoods.
Maps: Create a series of maps to show how different thematic patterns interconnect. Maps can help shift the narrative away from isolated “problem” neighborhoods and highlight the systemic disparities in tree cover that exist at a large scale.
Maps are highly versatile and can be used to convey the need for Tree Equity and highlight the benefits to members of the community. They can be useful in a number of ways, including in grant applications, presentations to the town board, fliers for a tree planting event, conversations local stakeholders and community members.
Print a PDF of the map
Copy/save an image of the map
Take a screenshot on your device
Go to our Methods & Data page for definitions and guidance to help you communicate the science that powers Tree Equity Score.
Made possible with tree canopy provided by
American Forests
1220 L Street, NW,
Suite 750
Washington, DC 20005